Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen has firmly rejected any notion of the United States asserting control over Greenland, stating, "You cannot annex another country." The statement comes amid renewed U.S. interest in Greenland’s strategic importance, sparking fresh diplomatic tensions.

A Renewed Focus on Greenland

Frederiksen made these remarks during a recent visit to Greenland, Denmark’s semi-autonomous Arctic territory, which has increasingly become a focal point in global geopolitics. Her visit follows U.S. Vice President JD Vance’s trip to a U.S. air base in Greenland, where he criticized Denmark for alleged underinvestment in the region. The U.S. has long regarded Greenland as a vital strategic asset, given its location and natural resources.

This is not the first time the U.S. has expressed interest in Greenland. In 2019, then-President Donald Trump floated the idea of purchasing the territory, a proposal Denmark swiftly dismissed as “absurd.” However, recent geopolitical shifts, including tensions with Russia and China, have brought Greenland back into the spotlight.

Denmark’s Stance and Commitment

During her visit, Frederiksen reaffirmed Denmark’s commitment to Greenland’s development and sovereignty, emphasizing that any decisions regarding its future rest solely with the people of Greenland. She underscored Denmark’s ongoing investments in infrastructure, economic growth, and self-governance, countering claims that Copenhagen has neglected its Arctic responsibilities.

Denmark’s leadership has been clear that while Greenland enjoys broad autonomy, it remains an integral part of the Danish Kingdom. Frederiksen’s strong response to U.S. interest signals Denmark’s resolve to maintain its territorial integrity while fostering cooperation with allies.

U.S.-Denmark Diplomatic Talks

Meanwhile, diplomatic discussions between Denmark and the U.S. continue. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently met with Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen in Brussels, where they reiterated their commitment to NATO and mutual security interests. However, the meeting carefully avoided direct mention of Greenland, focusing instead on broader strategic concerns.

Greenland’s Future: A Balancing Act

Greenland’s growing global significance places it at the center of a delicate balancing act. While Denmark remains committed to Greenland’s autonomy, external interest—particularly from the U.S. and China—poses new challenges. Greenland’s leadership has previously expressed ambitions for full independence, though economic reliance on Denmark remains a significant factor in shaping its future.

As geopolitical tensions rise, Frederiksen’s firm stance sends a clear message: Greenland’s future will be decided by its people, not by external powers. Whether this will deter further U.S. interest remains to be seen, but for now, Denmark is standing its ground.